The Dunbar and Leblanc suggestions aren't surprising, they're the next
logical step in the evolution of the Canadian media. The history of
communications in Canada, like in the United States, is a history of
bridging the divide between two coasts. The railways came first, then
radio.
A second theme present in almost all Canadian media, one perhaps even
more important than unification, is culturally defining the nation. If
railways and radio finally linked the coasts with material and
communications then these same companies were de-facto charged with
creating common culture as well.
1971's advent of Canadian Content laws, it can be said, represent an
innate fear present if not in Canadian society, than at least in
government media bureaucracy . A fear of Americanness. Being
overshadowed by the United States has contributed positively to some
aspects of Canadian Culture. Political passivity and commitment to
social welfare immediately come to mind. Though the same lack of
identity is what led to the creation of Can Con.
I see content laws as a huge threat to culture. Owing to strict
regulations imposed by them, (30% content between 6 am and pm)
Canadians are forced to watch sub-par acts simply for the sake of it.
Artistic dillution, while difficult to quantify has definitely
occurred, how else do you explain Shania Twain (Alberta aside).
Regardless of taste it should be clear to everyone that mandated
programming means mediocre programming. Stuff that, if it won't sell
will at least limp along as relatively acceptable to the masses. Which
brings me to my first point, deregulation's time has come. Given the
state of the internet and the locations where most people consume
their media now broadcast television and radio are becoming
antiquated. Expanding Can Con laws to new mediums is impossible. Cut
them loose now and give Canadian broadcasters a chance to either play
the Americans or develop their own stuff. The real artists will float
to the top anyway